Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
forum:data:2020:tanabe-tsugano_diagram_d_10_configuration [2020/03/05 18:37] – Created from the form at forum:start Riccardo Piomboforum:data:2020:tanabe-tsugano_diagram_d_10_configuration [2020/03/05 18:44] (current) Riccardo Piombo
Line 7: Line 7:
 Hi everyone, Hi everyone,
  
-While doing the Tanabe-Tsugano diagram of a transition metal (TM) complex, as the CuO square planar structure, I realized that when the electronic structure of the TM involves a d^n configuration with n<10 (in CuO n=9) everything's fine but when it involves an n=10 d^n configuration, as in the AgF case, my code gives me the following error: "bad argument #1 to 'pairs' (table expected, got user data)"+While doing the Tanabe-Tsugano diagram of a transition metal (TM) complex, as the CuO square planar structure, I realized that when the electronic structure of the TM involves a d^n configuration with n<10 (in CuO n=9) everything's fine but when it involves an n=10 d^n configuration, as in the octahedral AgF case, my code gives me the following error: "bad argument #1 to 'pairs' (table expected, got user data)"
 Here is the part of the code to which the error refers: Here is the part of the code to which the error refers:
  
Line 55: Line 55:
 </code> </code>
  
-The other way around if I uncomment the following line of code+The other way around if I uncomment the following line of code (the twelfth row from the beginning of the script):
  
 <code> <code>
Line 63: Line 63:
 The calculation is successful but it gives me an empty diagram. Can everyone please help me? The calculation is successful but it gives me an empty diagram. Can everyone please help me?
 Thanks in advance Thanks in advance
 +
 +P.S should the problem be linked with the fact that a d10 configuration is made by a single Slater determinant?
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
  
 ~~DISCUSSION|Answers~~ ~~DISCUSSION|Answers~~
  
Print/export