Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

forum:data:2025:problem_with_co_2p_xps_simulation [2025/09/03 10:03] – Created from the form at forum:start Sayari Ghatakforum:data:2025:problem_with_co_2p_xps_simulation [2025/09/03 14:27] (current) – Maurits W. Haverkort
Line 12: Line 12:
  
 I tried constructing my Hamiltonian with: I tried constructing my Hamiltonian with:
 +<code>
 Udd = NewOperator("U", NF, NB, {2,2}, {F0dd, F2dd, F4dd}) Udd = NewOperator("U", NF, NB, {2,2}, {F0dd, F2dd, F4dd})
 Upd = NewOperator("U", NF, NB, {1,2}, {F0pd, G1pd, G3pd}) Upd = NewOperator("U", NF, NB, {1,2}, {F0pd, G1pd, G3pd})
Line 17: Line 18:
 OpSOC_2p = NewOperator("ldots", NF, NB, {1}, {zeta_2p}) OpSOC_2p = NewOperator("ldots", NF, NB, {1}, {zeta_2p})
 CF = NewOperator("CF", NF, NB, {2}, {tenDq}) CF = NewOperator("CF", NF, NB, {2}, {tenDq})
 +</code>
 But I keep getting the error: But I keep getting the error:
 bad argument #2 to 'NewOperator' (table expected, got number) bad argument #2 to 'NewOperator' (table expected, got number)

You are here: Quanty - a quantum many body script language » Forum » data » 2025 » Problem with Co 2p XPS simulation

Print/export