Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

documentation:tutorials:nio_ligand_field:rixs_l23m1 [2016/10/09 15:40] – created Maurits W. Haverkortdocumentation:tutorials:nio_ligand_field:rixs_l23m1 [2016/10/10 09:41] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 1: Line 1:
 +{{indexmenu_n>9}}
 +====== RIXS $L_{2,3}M_{1}$ ======
  
 +###
 +Instead of looking at low energy excitations one can use RIXS to look at core-core excitations. A powerful technique comparable to other core level spectroscopies like x-ray absorption and core-level photoemission at once.
 +###
 +
 +###
 +Here a script to calculate the Ni $2p$ to $3d$ excitation ($L_{2,3}$) and Ni $3s$ to $2p$ decay ($M_{1}$).
 +<code Quanty RIXS_L23M1.Quanty>
 +-- This example calculates core - core RIXS spectra. These type of spectra are
 +-- highly informative and contain similar information as core level absorption and
 +-- core level photoemission combined. With generally enhances sensitivity.
 +
 +-- we focus here on 2p to 3d excitations (L23) and 3s to 2p decay (final hole in the 3s
 +-- state, the M1 edge)
 +
 +-- We use the definitions of all operators and basis orbitals as defined in the file
 +-- include and can afterwards directly continue by creating the Hamiltonian
 +-- and calculating the spectra
 +
 +dofile("Include.Quanty")
 +
 +-- The parameters and scheme needed is the same as the one used for XAS
 +
 +-- We follow the energy definitions as introduced in the group of G.A. Sawatzky (Groningen)
 +-- J. Zaanen, G.A. Sawatzky, and J.W. Allen PRL 55, 418 (1985)
 +-- for parameters of specific materials see
 +-- A.E. Bockquet et al. PRB 55, 1161 (1996)
 +-- After some initial discussion the energies U and Delta refer to the center of a configuration
 +-- The L^10 d^n   configuration has an energy 0
 +-- The L^9  d^n+1 configuration has an energy Delta
 +-- The L^8  d^n+2 configuration has an energy 2*Delta+Udd
 +--
 +-- If we relate this to the onsite energy of the L and d orbitals we find
 +-- 10 eL +  n    ed + n(n-1)     U/2 == 0
 +--  9 eL + (n+1) ed + (n+1)n     U/2 == Delta
 +--  8 eL + (n+2) ed + (n+1)(n+2) U/2 == 2*Delta+U
 +-- 3 equations with 2 unknowns, but with interdependence yield:
 +-- ed = (10*Delta-nd*(19+nd)*U/2)/(10+nd)
 +-- eL = nd*((1+nd)*Udd/2-Delta)/(10+nd)
 +--
 +-- For the final state we/they defined
 +-- The 2p^5 L^10 d^n+1 configuration has an energy 0
 +-- The 2p^5 L^9  d^n+2 configuration has an energy Delta + Udd - Upd
 +-- The 2p^5 L^8  d^n+3 configuration has an energy 2*Delta + 3*Udd - 2*Upd
 +--
 +-- If we relate this to the onsite energy of the p and d orbitals we find
 +-- 6 ep + 10 eL +  n    ed + n(n-1)     Udd/2 + 6 n     Upd == 0
 +-- 6 ep +  9 eL + (n+1) ed + (n+1)n     Udd/2 + 6 (n+1) Upd == Delta
 +-- 6 ep +  8 eL + (n+2) ed + (n+1)(n+2) Udd/2 + 6 (n+2) Upd == 2*Delta+Udd
 +-- 5 ep + 10 eL + (n+1) ed + (n+1)(n)   Udd/2 + 5 (n+1) Upd == 0
 +-- 5 ep +  9 eL + (n+2) ed + (n+2)(n+1) Udd/2 + 5 (n+2) Upd == Delta+Udd-Upd
 +-- 5 ep +  8 eL + (n+3) ed + (n+3)(n+2) Udd/2 + 5 (n+3) Upd == 2*Delta+3*Udd-2*Upd
 +-- 6 equations with 3 unknowns, but with interdependence yield:
 +-- epfinal = (10*Delta + (1+nd)*(nd*Udd/2-(10+nd)*Upd) / (16+nd)
 +-- edfinal = (10*Delta - nd*(31+nd)*Udd/2-90*Upd) / (16+nd)
 +-- eLfinal = ((1+nd)*(nd*Udd/2+6*Upd)-(6+nd)*Delta) / (16+nd)
 +--
 +-- note that ed-ep = Delta - nd * U and not Delta
 +-- note furthermore that ep and ed here are defined for the onsite energy if the system had
 +-- locally nd electrons in the d-shell. In DFT or Hartree Fock the d occupation is in the end not
 +-- nd and thus the onsite energy of the Kohn-Sham orbitals is not equal to ep and ed in model
 +-- calculations.
 +--
 +-- note furthermore that ep and eL actually should be different for most systems. We happily ignore this fact
 +-- 
 +-- We normally take U and Delta as experimentally determined parameters
 +--
 +-- besides the two configurations with either no core hole or the configuration with one
 +-- core hole in the 2p shell we now also need a configuration with one core hole in the
 +-- 3s shell
 +-- 
 +-- We define:
 +-- The 3s^1 L^10 d^n+1 configuration has an energy 0
 +-- The 3s^1 L^9  d^n+2 configuration has an energy   Delta +   Udd -   Usd
 +-- The 3s^1 L^8  d^n+3 configuration has an energy 2*Delta + 3*Udd - 2*Usd
 +--
 +-- If we relate this to the onsite energy of the s and d orbitals we find
 +-- 2 es + 10 eL +  n    ed + n(n-1)     Udd/2 + 2 n     Usd == 0
 +-- 2 es +  9 eL + (n+1) ed + (n+1)n     Udd/2 + 2 (n+1) Usd == Delta
 +-- 2 es +  8 eL + (n+2) ed + (n+1)(n+2) Udd/2 + 2 (n+2) Usd == 2*Delta+Udd
 +-- 1 es + 10 eL + (n+1) ed + (n+1)(n)   Udd/2 + 1 (n+1) Usd == 0
 +-- 1 es +  9 eL + (n+2) ed + (n+2)(n+1) Udd/2 + 1 (n+2) Usd == Delta+Udd-Usd
 +-- 1 es +  8 eL + (n+3) ed + (n+3)(n+2) Udd/2 + 1 (n+3) Usd == 2*Delta+3*Udd-2*Usd
 +--
 +-- 6 equations with 3 unknowns, but with interdependence yield:
 +-- eswiths = (10*Delta + (1+nd)*(nd*Udd/2-(10+nd)*Usd) / (12+nd)
 +-- edwiths = (10*Delta - nd*(23+nd)*Udd/2-22*Usd) / (12+nd)
 +-- eLwiths = ((1+nd)*(nd*Udd/2+2*Usd)-(2+nd)*Delta) / (12+nd)
 +
 +
 +-- number of electrons (formal valence)
 +nd = 8
 +-- parameters from experiment (core level PES)
 +Udd     =  7.3
 +Upd     =  8.5
 +Usd     =  6.0
 +Delta   =  4.7
 +-- parameters obtained from DFT (PRB 85, 165113 (2012))
 +F2dd    = 11.14 
 +F4dd    =  6.87
 +F2pd    =  6.67
 +G1pd    =  4.92
 +G3pd    =  2.80
 +G2sd    = 12.56
 +tenDq   =  0.56
 +tenDqL  =  1.44
 +Veg     =  2.06
 +Vt2g    =  1.21
 +zeta_3d =  0.081
 +zeta_2p = 11.51
 +Bz      =  0.000001
 +H112    =  0.120
 +
 +ed      = (10*Delta-nd*(19+nd)*Udd/2)/(10+nd)
 +eL      = nd*((1+nd)*Udd/2-Delta)/(10+nd)
 +
 +epfinal = (10*Delta + (1+nd)*(nd*Udd/2-(10+nd)*Upd)) / (16+nd)
 +edfinal = (10*Delta - nd*(31+nd)*Udd/2-90*Upd) / (16+nd)
 +eLfinal = ((1+nd)*(nd*Udd/2+6*Upd) - (6+nd)*Delta) / (16+nd)
 +
 +eswiths = (10*Delta + (1+nd)*(nd*Udd/2-(10+nd)*Usd)) / (12+nd)
 +edwiths = (10*Delta - nd*(23+nd)*Udd/2-22*Usd) / (12+nd)
 +eLwiths = ((1+nd)*(nd*Udd/2+2*Usd) - (2+nd)*Delta) / (12+nd)
 +
 +F0dd    = Udd + (F2dd+F4dd) * 2/63
 +F0pd    = Upd + (1/15)*G1pd + (3/70)*G3pd
 +F0sd    = Usd + G2sd/10
 +
 +Hamiltonian    =  F0dd*OppF0_3d + F2dd*OppF2_3d + F4dd*OppF4_3d + zeta_3d*Oppldots_3d + Bz*(2*OppSz_3d + OppLz_3d) + H112 * (OppSx_3d+OppSy_3d+2*OppSz_3d)/sqrt(6) + tenDq*OpptenDq_3d + tenDqL*OpptenDq_Ld + Veg * OppVeg + Vt2g * OppVt2g + ed      * OppN_3d + eL      * OppN_Ld
 +            
 +XASHamiltonian =  F0dd*OppF0_3d + F2dd*OppF2_3d + F4dd*OppF4_3d + zeta_3d*Oppldots_3d + Bz*(2*OppSz_3d + OppLz_3d) + H112 * (OppSx_3d+OppSy_3d+2*OppSz_3d)/sqrt(6) + tenDq*OpptenDq_3d + tenDqL*OpptenDq_Ld + Veg * OppVeg + Vt2g * OppVt2g + edfinal * OppN_3d + eLfinal * OppN_Ld + epfinal * OppN_2p + zeta_2p * Oppcldots + F0pd * OppUpdF0 + F2pd * OppUpdF2 + G1pd * OppUpdG1 + G3pd * OppUpdG3  
 +
 +Hamiltonian3s  =  F0dd*OppF0_3d + F2dd*OppF2_3d + F4dd*OppF4_3d + zeta_3d*Oppldots_3d + Bz*(2*OppSz_3d + OppLz_3d) + H112 * (OppSx_3d+OppSy_3d+2*OppSz_3d)/sqrt(6) + tenDq*OpptenDq_3d + tenDqL*OpptenDq_Ld + Veg * OppVeg + Vt2g * OppVt2g + edwiths * OppN_3d + eLwiths * OppN_Ld + eswiths * OppN_3s                       + F0sd * OppUsdF0 + G2sd * OppUsdG2
 +
 +               
 +-- we now can create the lowest Npsi eigenstates:
 +Npsi=3
 +-- in order to make sure we have a filling of 8 electrons we need to define some restrictions
 +StartRestrictions = {NF, NB, {"000000 00 1111111111 0000000000",8,8}, {"111111 11 0000000000 1111111111",18,18}}
 +
 +psiList = Eigensystem(Hamiltonian, StartRestrictions, Npsi)
 +oppList={Hamiltonian, OppSsqr, OppLsqr, OppJsqr, OppSx_3d, OppLx_3d, OppSy_3d, OppLy_3d, OppSz_3d, OppLz_3d, Oppldots_3d, OppF2_3d, OppF4_3d, OppNeg_3d, OppNt2g_3d, OppNeg_Ld, OppNt2g_Ld, OppN_3d}
 +
 +-- print of some expectation values
 +print("  #    <E>      <S^2>    <L^2>    <J^2>    <S_x^3d> <L_x^3d> <S_y^3d> <L_y^3d> <S_z^3d> <L_z^3d> <l.s>    <F[2]>   <F[4]>   <Neg^3d> <Nt2g^3d><Neg^Ld> <Nt2g^Ld><N^3d>");
 +for i = 1,#psiList do
 +  io.write(string.format("%3i ",i))
 +  for j = 1,#oppList do
 +    expectationvalue = Chop(psiList[i]*oppList[j]*psiList[i])
 +    io.write(string.format("%8.3f ",expectationvalue))
 +  end
 +  io.write("\n")
 +end
 +
 +
 +
 +-- spectra XAS
 +XASSpectra = CreateSpectra(XASHamiltonian, T2p3dx, psiList[1], {{"Emin",-10}, {"Emax",20}, {"NE",3500}, {"Gamma",1.0}})
 +XASSpectra.Print({{"file","RIXSL23M1_XAS.dat"}})
 +
 +-- spectra FY
 +FYSpectra = CreateFluorescenceYield(XASHamiltonian, T2p3dx, T3s2py, psiList[1], {{"Emin",-10}, {"Emax",20}, {"NE",3500}, {"Gamma",1.0}})
 +FYSpectra.Print({{"file","RIXSL23M1_FY.dat"}})
 +
 +-- spectra RIXS
 +RIXSSpectra = CreateResonantSpectra(XASHamiltonian, Hamiltonian3s, T2p3dx, T3s2py, psiList[1], {{"Emin1",-10}, {"Emax1",20}, {"NE1",120}, {"Gamma1",1.0}, {"Emin2",-1}, {"Emax2",9}, {"NE2",1000}, {"Gamma2",0.5}})
 +RIXSSpectra.Print({{"file","RIXSL23M1.dat"}})
 +
 +print("Finished calculating the spectra now start plotting.\nThis might take more time than the calculation");
 +
 +-- and make some plots
 +gnuplotInput = [[
 +set autoscale 
 +set xtic auto 
 +set ytic auto 
 +set style line  1 lt 1 lw 1 lc rgb "#000000"
 +set style line  2 lt 1 lw 1 lc rgb "#FF0000"
 +set style line  3 lt 1 lw 1 lc rgb "#00FF00"
 +set style line  4 lt 1 lw 1 lc rgb "#0000FF"
 +
 +set out 'RIXSL23M1_Map.ps'
 +set terminal postscript portrait enhanced color  "Times" 8 size 7.5,6
 +
 +unset colorbox
 +
 +energyshift=857.6
 +energyshiftM1=110.8
 +
 +set multiplot 
 +set size 0.5,0.55
 +set origin 0,0
 +
 +set ylabel "resonant energy (eV)" font "Times,10"
 +set xlabel "energy loss (eV)" font "Times,10"
 +
 +set yrange [852:860]
 +set xrange [energyshiftM1-0.5:energyshiftM1+7.5]
 +
 +plot "<(awk '((NR>5)&&(NR<1007)){for(i=3;i<=NF;i=i+2){printf \"%s \", $i}{printf \"%s\", RS}}' RIXSL23M1.dat)" matrix using ($2/100-1.0+energyshiftM1):($1/4+energyshift-10):(-$3) with image notitle 
 +
 +set origin 0.5,0
 +
 +set yrange [869:877]
 +set xrange [energyshiftM1-0.5:energyshiftM1+7.5]
 +
 +plot "<(awk '((NR>5)&&(NR<1007)){for(i=3;i<=NF;i=i+2){printf \"%s \", $i}{printf \"%s\", RS}}' RIXSL23M1.dat)" matrix using ($2/100-1.0+energyshiftM1):($1/4+energyshift-10):(-$3) with image notitle 
 +
 +unset multiplot
 +
 +set out 'RIXSL23M1_Spec.ps'
 +set size 1.0, 1.0
 +set terminal postscript portrait enhanced color  "Times" 8 size 7.5,5
 +
 +set multiplot 
 +set size 0.25,1.0
 +set origin 0,0
 +
 +set ylabel "E (eV)" font "Times,10"
 +set xlabel "XAS" font "Times,10"
 +set yrange [energyshift-10:energyshift+20]
 +set xrange [-0.3:0]
 +plot "RIXSL23M1_XAS.dat"  using       3:($1+energyshift) notitle with lines ls  1,\
 +     "RIXSL23M1_FY.dat"   using (-5*$2):($1+energyshift) notitle with lines ls  4
 +
 +set size 0.8,1.0
 +set origin 0.2,0.0
 +
 +set xlabel "Energy loss (eV)" font "Times,10"
 +unset ylabel 
 +unset ytics
 +set xrange [energyshiftM1-0.5:energyshiftM1+7.5]
 +
 +ofset = 0.25 
 +scale=10
 +
 +plot for [i=0:120] "RIXSL23M1.dat"  using ($1+energyshiftM1):(-column(3+2*i)*scale+ofset*i-10 + energyshift) notitle with lines ls  4
 +
 +unset multiplot
 +]]
 +
 +-- write the gnuplot script to a file
 +file = io.open("RIXSL23M1.gnuplot", "w")
 +file:write(gnuplotInput)
 +file:close()
 +
 +
 +-- call gnuplot to execute the script
 +os.execute("gnuplot RIXSL23M1.gnuplot")
 +-- transform to pdf and eps
 +os.execute("ps2pdf RIXSL23M1_Map.ps  ; ps2eps RIXSL23M1_Map.ps  ;  mv RIXSL23M1_Map.eps temp.eps  ; eps2eps temp.eps RIXSL23M1_Map.eps  ; rm temp.eps")
 +os.execute("ps2pdf RIXSL23M1_Spec.ps ; ps2eps RIXSL23M1_Spec.ps ;  mv RIXSL23M1_Spec.eps temp.eps ; eps2eps temp.eps RIXSL23M1_Spec.eps ; rm temp.eps")
 +</code>
 +###
 +
 +Just like in the case of $L_{2,3}M_{4,5}$ edge RIXS we can make plots:
 +
 +| {{ :documentation:tutorials:nio_ligand_field:rixsl23m1_spec.png?nolink |}} |
 +^ Resonant inelastic x-ray scattering spectra for different incoming and outgoing photon energies. ^
 + 
 + The first shows on the left the XAS spectra in black and the integrated RIXS spectra (FY) in blue. The core-core RIXS is shown on the right. 
 +
 +| {{ :documentation:tutorials:nio_ligand_field:rixsl23m1_map.png?nolink |}} |
 +^ Resonant inelastic x-ray scattering spectra for different incoming and outgoing photon energies. ^
 + 
 +
 +The second plot shows the same RIXS spectra, but now as an intensity map.
 +
 +###
 +The output of the script is:
 +<file Quanty_Output RIXS_L23M1.out>
 +  #    <E>      <S^2>    <L^2>    <J^2>    <S_x^3d> <L_x^3d> <S_y^3d> <L_y^3d> <S_z^3d> <L_z^3d> <l.s>    <F[2]>   <F[4]>   <Neg^3d> <Nt2g^3d><Neg^Ld> <Nt2g^Ld><N^3d>
 +  1   -3.503    1.999   12.000   15.095   -0.370   -0.115   -0.370   -0.115   -0.741   -0.230   -0.305   -1.042   -0.924    2.186    5.990    3.825    6.000    8.175 
 +  2   -3.395    1.999   12.000   15.160   -0.002   -0.000   -0.002   -0.000   -0.003   -0.001   -0.322   -1.043   -0.925    2.189    5.988    3.823    6.000    8.178 
 +  3   -3.286    1.999   12.000   15.211    0.369    0.113    0.369    0.113    0.737    0.227   -0.336   -1.043   -0.925    2.193    5.987    3.820    6.000    8.180 
 +Start of LanczosTriDiagonalizeKrylovMC
 +Start of LanczosTriDiagonalizeKrylovMC
 +Finished calculating the spectra now start plotting.
 +This might take more time than the calculation
 +</file>
 +###
 +
 +
 +===== Table of contents =====
 +{{indexmenu>.#1|msort}}

You are here: Quanty - a quantum many body script language » Documentation » Tutorials » NiO ligand field » RIXS $L_{2,3}M_{1}$

Print/export