DFTtoMLFT Energy definition for XPS calculation
asked by Hamza (2025/01/28 12:53)
Dear Quantum Developer,
Inspired by the XAS script for DFTtoMLFT, we aim to calculate the XPS.
Regarding the energy definitions, we encountered different scenarios. Let’s consider the following configurations:
1. p6L18dn: ground state 2. p5L18dn: excitation from the p-orbital to the vacuum 3. p6L17dn+1: charge transfer (CT) from the ligand to the transition metal (TM)
Based on these scenarios, I derived the following equations:
6x+18y+ndz+nd(nd−1)Udd2+6ndUpd=0 5x+18y+ndz+nd(nd−1)Udd2+5ndUpd=0 6x+17y+(nd+1)z+nd(nd+1)Udd2+6(nd+1)Upd=Δ
Here, epfinal, eLfinal, and edfinal correspond to x, y, and z, respectively.
Are these equations correct?
After performing the calculations and plotting the XPS and XAS spectra on the same figure, I noticed a difference in the energy interval between the two peaks. The XPS peaks appear closer to each other compared to the XAS peaks, even though I used the same parameters for both calculations.
Could this difference be due to the coefficients in front of Upd in the above equations, or is there another explanation?
Best regards, Hamza
Answers
Dear Hamza,
I'm not 100% sure I understand your question correctly, but there is a difference between a charge neutral experiment (XAS) and an experiment whereby you remove one electron (core level XPS). If you look at |fig 1.1 on page 3 at this link you get an energy level diagram for the different experiments. The dn configuration is at zero, the L_1dn+1 configuration at an energy Δ. With a core hole the energies shift by Ucd with a core hole and extra d electron by Udd−Ucd.
Does this help?
PS you can test your script by multiplying all hoppings by 0.001, setting F2 and F4 to zero and taking Δ=0. Then the energies you get should be only determined by the U's and Δ.
Best wishes, Maurits